![]() ![]() The 2023 Envy 16 is a legitimate upgrade for creators looking for a reasonably priced laptop with strong creative performance. The previous generation of the Envy 16 also exhibited average performance in synthetic benchmarks, but much better performance in PugetBench. The HP also compared well against the MacBook Pro 14 with the M2 Max CPU. This benchmark can utilize the GPU to speed up various tasks, and the Envy 16, with its RTX 4060, beats the Dell XPS 15 (narrowly) and Dell XPS 17, both of which use RTX 4070 GPUs. Where the Envy 16 shines is in its performance in the PugetBench Premiere Pro benchmark that runs in a live version of Adobe Premiere Pro. The Envy 16 is slightly faster than some laptops with the Core i7, but not by that much in our CPU-intensive synthetic benchmarks. It has the same number of cores and threads as the more common Core i7-13700H, but its cores run faster and hotter. The 2023 HP Envy 16 features the 45-watt Intel Core i9-13900H, with 14 cores (six Performance at 5.4GHz and eight Efficient at 4.1GHz) and 20 threads. An even faster low-cost creator’s workstation Mark Coppock/Digital Trends It’s unfortunate, though, that HP doesn’t currently offer a lower-priced configuration with the OLED display, because as you’ll see in my testing, the IPS panel doesn’t quite live up to the needs of creators. Each of those prices is less than the competition, making the Envy 16 something of a bargain among machines aimed at creators. You’ll spend $2,685 to double the RAM and storage and opt for a 2.8K OLED display. MacBook Pro M2 Pro/M2 Max buying guide: how to make the right choice While the reference Radeon HD 7870 was able to keep up with the Radeon HD 7950 at the resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels resolution, it did fall behind on the highest resolution setting, with the 7950 pulling level with the custom cards.Īgain, we saw a massive improvement compared to the previous generation, with even the reference HD 7870 outperforming the GTX 580 this time.Why the latest ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 8 isn’t worth the upgrade We saw a very similar pattern in the Unigine 2.1 benchmark, with ASUS pulling slightly ahead of the '1100MHz pack', and Sapphire trailing slightly behind. We were also impressed to see the Radeon HD 7870 perform very closely to NVIDIA's previous generation flagship powerhouse, the GeForce GTX 580, and all custom models actually surpassed it. ![]() ![]() Meanwhile, ASUS led the pack thanks to its marginally higher memory clock speed, while Sapphire's slightly slower core clock saw it fall behind by about 2%.Īgainst the reference card, the custom models showed roughly a 7% increase in performance on average - not a massive gain, but still significant. Surprisingly, against the higher-end Radeon HD 7950, all of the overclocked 7870 cards were able to outperform it, and even the reference 7870 was only behind by about 3%.Ĭompared to the previous generation Radeon HD 6870, we saw a massive improvement, with the custom cards posting an almost 60% increase in performance and the reference HD 7870 surpassing it by 45%. On both the Performance and Extreme presets, there wasn't much separating the custom Radeon HD 7870 cards, with all four cards clocked at 1100MHz at the GPU core performing within 1% of each other. First up, 3DMark 11, which tests various DirectX 11 functions like tessellation and DirectCompute. 3DMark11 & Unigine 2.1 "Heaven" Results 3D Mark 11 Resultsīefore we get into the actual gaming benchmarks, lets take a look at a couple of dedicated theoretical benchmarks first. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |